Employers regularly take disciplinary action against employees. Often the outcome is a warning. In serious cases a final written warning may be given. The ultimate sanction will be for gross misconduct whereby your employment can be terminated immediately without payment or payment in lieu of notice.
Facing disciplinary allegations is often incredibly stressful but our employment law solicitors are well placed to advise you on the best course of action, and how best to respond to the allegations you face.
You may not be able to take the risk that your employer makes a finding of gross misconduct against you leading to dismissal because of the impact on your reputation and therefore your ability to secure another job. However, if you wish to defend allegations, the disciplinary procedure is your opportunity to do this and our employment solicitors are well placed to give you the best advice and help you ensure your position is protected.
If you are dismissed and you subsequently pursue an Employment Tribunal claim, the case that you advance at the internal disciplinary may be crucial to your position at Tribunal, so it is important to think ahead to ensure that nothing is said or done that ultimately compromises your position.
Our employment law solicitors will be able to ensure correct procedures are being followed and that you advance your case in the best and most effective way throughout the disciplinary procedure.
We will also identify whether there might be any form of discrimination present in the allegations being made against you and, if so, we can advise on how you deal with those with your employer.
If you are dismissed for gross misconduct, you may have a claim for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (assuming no notice is paid or given). Our employment solicitors can analyse your case and identify the strength and value of these and any other claims you may have.
More from the Downs Blog
In April of each year, the Government increases statutory payments that are payable to workers and employees.
Under new government guidance, you should work from home if you can effectively do so. However, some employers may ask their employees to return to work whilst restrictions are in place - particularly if it is not reasonable to carry out that work at home. For those who are concerned about health problems, or juggling childcare, where do you stand in the eyes of the law?
The third lockdown in England legally came into force on 6 January 2021. How long it will last is uncertain. At least until mid-February and possibly until late March. Vaccination provides a route out of the pandemic, but businesses need to survive this final and possibly longest of the lockdowns.
During these uncertain times, it is good to know you can count on us.
Even after the recent Government announcement of another national lockdown we remain open for business and are here to help you.
On Thursday 5 November 2020, the Chancellor announced that the furlough scheme is to be extended until the end of March 2021. During this period you will be able to claim up to 80% of an Employees salary up to a cap of £2500.
The Chancellor announced over the weekend that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) that was due to end on 31st October will be extended until 2nd December. The level of support available under the extended scheme will mirror that of what was available under the CJRS in August, with the Government paying 80% of wages up to a cap of £2,500.
The Chancellor announced on Thursday 22 October that the Government contribution to employers’ wage costs under the Job Support Scheme (JSS) will be increased. Employers will be expected to pay 5% of the cost of unworked hours instead of the 33% originally announced.
Back in the summer the Chancellor announced that employers could receive a one-off payment of £1,000 for every employee who had previously been furloughed under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme provided they remained continuously employed to the end of January 2021. Businesses will be able to claim the Job Retention Bonus from 15 February 2021 and the Government has stated that further guidance will be provided by the end of January 2021.
With new government guidance on Covid coming into force today and the current furlough scheme coming to an end next month, as expected, the Chancellor has today announced a new scheme to help businesses.
As Covid-19 cases continue to climb, the UK faces ever tougher restrictions. But, with the furlough scheme winding down, what rights do employers and employees have when returning to work?
Barclays Bank has withdrawn a system that monitored employees’ computers, tracking individual working patterns and how much time each day was spent on breaks. Details of the pilot project came to light after a Barclays whistle blower reported it to a newspaper.
From 6 April 2020 there will be changes to the minimum written terms that must be provided to employees AND the timing of when these terms must be provided to them. These terms are known as Section 1 statements, referring to Section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA).
Downs Solicitors is pleased to play a small part in helping to raise awareness of a new and important piece of employment law that is coming into force in April 2020. The Parental Bereavement Leave and Pay Regulations will be known as Jack’s Law. This is in memory of Jack Herd who died in 2010 and whose mother, Lucy, has campaigned tirelessly ever since for mandatory leave for grieving parents.
One of the big focuses in recent years has been on flexible working and how it has changed the concept of a “normal” working day. From challenging the norms of 9-5 working to commuting time counting as working time, there’s no doubt that the new decade could bring a new shape of working – but what does that mean for business leaders and their HR teams?
Jordi Casamitjana was dismissed in 2018 by The League Against Cruel sports for gross misconduct. Mr Casamitjana, an ethical vegan, claims that his dismissal came after telling colleagues that their employer’s pension fund was being invested in companies involved in animal testing. His solicitors claimed that the decision to dismiss was made because of his beliefs around ethical veganism.